320 Revista del Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos Núm. 1/ 2013 Table X. Weighting of the credibility of the content for each country according to their OPAC averages Number Meaning Interval 1 Confirmed (4.2-5 2 Probable (3.4-4 3 Possible (2.6-3.4 4 Doubtful (1.8-2.6 5 Unlikely 1-1.8 6 Precision cannot be evaluated - In this way, we have provided a pair of characters corresponding to these two scales to the information available in the different information systems, based upon the OPAC values obtained, as is shown in Table XI. The reliability of the source will be in line with the reliability of each one of the tools, whilst the credibility of the content will be based upon the country. The aim of this table is to offer the analyst a value of reference regarding the reliability of the tools following the country about which the enquiry seeking information is made.
REVISTA IEEE 1
To see the actual publication please follow the link above