400 Journal of the Spanish Institute for Strategic Studies N. 6 / 2015 JERVIS, R. Deterrence and perception, International security, vol. 7, winter 1982-83. JONES, Peter. New directions in Middle East deterrence: Implications for Arms Controls, Middle East Review of International Affairs, v.1, n.4, 1997. KOTARSI, Kris. Quoting Patrick M. Morgan in “Deterring the undeterrable? Proliferation concerns in a world of “Rogue states” and non-state actors.” Chapter IV in Wilner, Alexandre. Revolution or evolution: emerging threats to security in the 21st century. Dalhousie: University Centre for Foreign Policy Studies, 2006. LUPOVICI, Amir. The Emerging Fourth Wave of Deterrence theory Toward a New Research Agenda, International Studies Quarterly, volume 54, Issue 3, September 2010. MORGAN, Patrick M. and Wirtz, James J., edited by TV. Paul, Complex Deterrence, Chicago. The University of Chicago Press, 2009. MORGAN, Patrick M. Non-State actors, Nuclear Next Use, and Deterrence, California: University of California Irvine, 2011. MORGAN, Patrick. Deterrence Now, Cambridge, Cambridge Studies in International Relations, Cambridge University Press, 2003. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. Postcold war conflict deterrence, National Academy of Sciences, 1997. NED LEBOW, Richard and GROSS STEIN, Janice. Rational deterrence theory: I think, therefore I deter. World politics, vol. 41, No. 2, 1989. NOPF, Jeffrey. The fourth wave in deterrence research, Contemporary Security Police http://revista.ieee.es/index.php/ieee Issue, 2010. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE STATE. Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the Era of Massive Retaliation, Cold War Foreign Policy Series. Special Study 3, 2012. SAGAN, Scott D. The perils of proliferation: Organization Theory, Deterrence Theory, and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons, International Security, Vol. 4, 1994. SLANTCHEV, Branislav L. Deterrence and compellence. Introduction to International Relations, Department of Political Sciences, California, University of San Diego, 2005. SODUPE, Keppa. La teoría de la disuasión: un análisis de las debilidades del paradigma estatocéntrico. Barcelona: Àfers Internacionals, núm. 22, CIDOB, 1991. SOKOLSKI, Henry D. Getting MAD: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, its origins and practice. Sweden: SSI, 2004.
Revista del IEEE 6
To see the actual publication please follow the link above