309 Yaiza Rubio y Félix Brezo The over exposure of geographic information a scatter plot, with the aim of defining a model capable of estimating what would be the quality of the data shown on the basis of a set of parameters. We will utilise the accuracy of this regression model to generate an indicator of the degree of exposure in the geographic information network. In order to verify the predictive model set out above, we have compared the score obtained for Spain with the values estimated by the model, with a twofold objective: first to determine what is the place that it refers to, in comparison with the other countries in the sample and then to specify the margin of error of this. 4. Dissemination.The conclusions obtained through the following publication will be placed at the disposal of the readers. 3. Detection of deception Easy access to geographic information becomes a problem for national defence when there are infrastructures available that have great strategic or military value. Amongst the reasons that exist for practising deception in cartographic services is the importance of the information shown and the large numbers of people that can obtain access to this via Internet by means of it being distributed. This is why it is necessary to determine whether the countries are taking measures to protect themselves as regards the over-exposure of information, producing certain potential alterations that the images may be subject to8 This is related to a concept that must always be present in an analysis: deception as a set of measures aimed at inducing mistakes by the enemy by means of the manipulation, the deformation or the falsification of evidence so as to get it to act in a way that is detrimental to its interests. In this context, there is a fundamental benefit to the mere consideration of the hypothesis of the deception: the fact of providing greater consistency to the information utilised or to discredit it, in this way assisting those undertaking it to reinforce their decision-making capacity. However, if the analyst accepts the possibility that part of the information has been manipulated, this could cast doubts about the validity of the conclusions drawn. We have used the methodology proposed by Heuer and Pherson for detecting deception so as to avoid the analysis becoming paralysed9, which consists of responding to a set of questions grouped together into four blocks: MOM (Motives, Opportunities, Means), POP (Past Opposition Practices), MOSES (Manipulability of Sources) and 8 HEUER, Richard J. Cognitive factors in deception and counterdeception, in Strategic Military Deception, 1982. 9 HEUER, Richard J. and PHERSON, Randolph H. Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis, CQ Press College, 2010.
REVISTA IEEE 1
To see the actual publication please follow the link above